From: Alex Xie <alexbin....@amd.com>
Use == instead of != in the if statement to make code easier understood
Signed-off-by: Alex Xie <AlexBin.Xie at amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
index 22fa4f8..0c17348 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
@@ -780,8 +780,13 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_update_ptes(struct amdgpu_device
*adev,
next_pe_start = amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset(pt);
next_pe_start += (addr & mask) * 8;
- if (cur_pe_end != next_pe_start) {
-
+ if (cur_pe_end == next_pe_start) {
+ /* The next ptb is consecutive to current ptb.
+ * Don't call amdgpu_vm_frag_ptes now.
+ * Will update two ptbs together in future.
+ */
+ cur_pe_end += 8 * nptes;
+ } else {
amdgpu_vm_frag_ptes(adev, vm_update_params,
cur_pe_start, cur_pe_end,
cur_dst, flags);
@@ -789,8 +794,6 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_update_ptes(struct amdgpu_device
*adev,
cur_pe_start = next_pe_start;
cur_pe_end = next_pe_start + 8 * nptes;
cur_dst = dst;
- } else {
- cur_pe_end += 8 * nptes;
}
addr += nptes;
--
2.5.5
