Hi Maxime,

Am Donnerstag, den 14.01.2016, 16:24 +0100 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> The core currently doesn't check that the DT cell size matches what the
> driver declares, which means that every xlate function needs to duplicate
> that check.
> 
> Make sure that of_reset_control_get checks for this to avoid duplication
> and errors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  drivers/reset/core.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/core.c b/drivers/reset/core.c
> index 7955e00d04d4..d53b2b980bdd 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/core.c
> @@ -46,9 +46,6 @@ struct reset_control {
>  static int of_reset_simple_xlate(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
>                         const struct of_phandle_args *reset_spec)
>  {
> -     if (WARN_ON(reset_spec->args_count != rcdev->of_reset_n_cells))
> -             return -EINVAL;
> -
>       if (reset_spec->args[0] >= rcdev->nr_resets)
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
> @@ -182,6 +179,9 @@ struct reset_control *of_reset_control_get(struct 
> device_node *node,
>               return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
>       }
>  
> +     if (WARN_ON(args.args_count != rcdev->of_reset_n_cells))
> +             return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +

Applied with this fix:

-       if (WARN_ON(args.args_count != rcdev->of_reset_n_cells))
+       if (WARN_ON(args.args_count != rcdev->of_reset_n_cells)) {
+               mutex_unlock(&reset_controller_list_mutex);
                return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+       }

No further action needed if you agree, otherwise let me know and I'll
back it out.

best regards
Philipp

Reply via email to