Am 13.01.2016 um 12:15 schrieb Marek Olšák: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Christian König > <deathsimple at vodafone.de> wrote: >> Am 12.01.2016 um 22:30 schrieb Alex Deucher: >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Marek Olšák <maraeo at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> These are libdrm_amdgpu patches harvested from an internal branch. >>>> >>>> The first patch is a revert I had to make to fix the build. Yeah, >>>> sequence_mutex should be renamed to a more appropriate name. That can be >>>> done as a follow-up. >>>> >>>> One notable change is the addition of DRM_IOCTL_AMDGPU_WAIT_FENCES. I >>>> hope the kernel contains (or will contain) the changes too, so that I don't >>>> push something that doesn't exist in the kernel. >>> We haven't pushed DRM_IOCTL_AMDGPU_WAIT_FENCES upstream yet so I would >>> hold off on any changes that depend on that. >> >> Yeah, and do we really have patch #9 in our internal branch without an >> Review? Cause that one breaks the API. > It doesn't break the API, because the API is added by this series in > an earlier patch. The API would be broken if it was changed between > two libdrm versions.
Ah, in this case please squash the two patches together for upstreaming. Regards, Christian. > > Marek
