Thanks for reply, this patch is mainly for performance reason. since TTM is to clear page for all non-fixed memory (GTT and CPU domains), which takes much more CPU overhead. The patch is to remove 'clear page' for GTT domain. btw: Micheal has rejected this patch.
Regards, David Zhou (Chunming) On 2016å¹´01æ05æ¥ 22:32, Lucas Stach wrote: > Hi David, > > why is this patch 2/4 if it's just a single patch? > > Am Dienstag, den 05.01.2016, 11:55 +0800 schrieb david1.zhou at amd.com: >> From: Chunming Zhou <David1.Zhou at amd.com> >> >> Change-Id: I653d61e32faaa11c39bb978bf90301513a0c35b8 > This change-id is just pure noise when you submit something upstream. > > Please add a proper change log on why the change below is > necessary/helpful. > > Regards, > Lucas > >> Signed-off-by: Chunming Zhou <David1.Zhou at amd.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c >> index 745e996..0633b65 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c >> @@ -301,6 +301,7 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct >> ttm_buffer_object *bo, >> if (!(new_man->flags & TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_FIXED)) { >> if (bo->ttm == NULL) { >> bool zero = !(old_man->flags & >> TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_FIXED); >> + zero = (mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM) ? >> zero : false; >> ret = ttm_bo_add_ttm(bo, zero); >> if (ret) >> goto out_err;