On 02/24/2016 01:34 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 01:11:24PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> >> >> On 23/02/16 12:43, Archit Taneja wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 02/23/2016 02:48 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >>>> >>>> On 22/02/16 22:10, Rob Herring wrote: >>>> >>>>>> If we want all DSI host controllers to use a common binding to describe >>>>>> lanes, we'd need to go with the most flexible one, and the driver >>>>>> restricts it to the subsets that we support. >>>> >>>> True, but I wonder if that's necessary. The lane property for the SoC >>>> should be read by the SoC specific driver, right? So the DT property can >>>> be anything. I'm not sure if there's ever a reason for a generic code to >>>> observe the DSI lane setup. >>> >>> Yeah, it is very SoC specific. > > Agreed.
Okay. We probably don't need to go with a generic binding, then. I'll simplify the msm/dsi lane bindings (i.e, drop the clock lanes, and represent things in lanes instead of pins). Thanks, Archit -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
