On ma, 2016-12-12 at 11:53 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > Acknowledging that we were building up the hole was more useful to me > when reading the code, than knowing the relationship between this node > and the previous node. >
I don't really agree. I see that we have nodes and there are holes that follow them, so prev_node makes more sense in that mindset. node->scanned_preceeds_hole = hole->hole_follows; and hole->hole_follows = 1; look especially quirky to me when read aloud. Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation
