On Dec 9 2016 23:06, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote: >> Anyway, we're mostly on the end of development for 4.10 cycle, and the >> review process for new feature might be delay till 4.10-rc1 release, two >> weeks later. During the weeks. bug fixes are preferable to be applied. > > Thank you for warning me. No problem for the delay, i fully understand > that focus is on bug fixes. > Notice that it is quite difficult for developers to find the best timing > to address this kind of patch, as integration process is not always > simple to follow... this probably come with experience.
ALSA is a development project for sound subsystem of Linux operating system, and our work is a part of Linux kernel. Therefore, it's better to follow generic behavior in Linux kernel development. > So if i well understand your remark the best windows to integrate a > feature for the version N+1, is to propose patch from N-rc1 tag. > (expecting that patch-set is enough mature to be integrated in N+1...) It's a better way if you're aware of maintainers' work and your task allows you to do things steadily. Regards Takashi Sakamoto
