On 2016年12月06日 23:40, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> When virtio_gpu_free_vbufs exits due to list empty, it does not
> drop the free_vbufs lock that it took.
> list empty is not expected to happen anyway, but it can't hurt to fix
> this and drop the lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c | 4 +++-
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Reviewed-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>

>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
> index 5a0f8a7..2f0c2f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
> @@ -109,8 +109,10 @@ void virtio_gpu_free_vbufs(struct virtio_gpu_device 
> *vgdev)
>   
>       spin_lock(&vgdev->free_vbufs_lock);
>       for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> -             if (WARN_ON(list_empty(&vgdev->free_vbufs)))
> +             if (WARN_ON(list_empty(&vgdev->free_vbufs))) {
> +                     spin_unlock(&vgdev->free_vbufs_lock);
>                       return;
> +             }
>               vbuf = list_first_entry(&vgdev->free_vbufs,
>                                       struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer, list);
>               list_del(&vbuf->list);

Reply via email to