Am Donnerstag, 4. August 2016, 22:23:05 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
> Hi Lin,
> 
> Am Freitag, 29. Juli 2016, 15:56:56 schrieb Lin Huang:
> > On new rockchip platform(rk3399 etc), there have dcf controller to
> > do ddr frequency scaling, and this controller will implement in
> > arm-trust-firmware. We add a special clock-type to handle that.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lin Huang <hl at rock-chips.com>
> 
> please also include the ARM people from last time in your list.
> The arm_smccc_smc calls look correct on first glance, but there is only
> one other example in the kernel [0] outside psci that is using it, so I'd
> like some confirmation that we're doing the right thing :-)
> 
> 
> [0]
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/arm/mach-artpec/board-artpec6.c
> #L55
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h
> > index bac775d..2e3bccf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h
> > @@ -281,6 +281,13 @@ struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_mmc(const char
> > *name, const char *const *parent_names, u8 num_parents,
> > 
> >                             void __iomem *reg, int shift);
> > 
> > +struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_ddrclk(const char *name, int flags,
> > +                   const char *const *parent_names, u8 num_parents,
> > +                   int mux_offset, int mux_shift, int mux_width,
> > +                   int mux_flag, int div_shift, int div_width,
> > +                   int div_flag, void __iomem *reg_base,
> > +                   spinlock_t *lock);
> > +
> > 
> >  #define ROCKCHIP_INVERTER_HIWORD_MASK      BIT(0)
> >  
> >  struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_inverter(const char *name,
> > 
> > @@ -299,6 +306,7 @@ enum rockchip_clk_branch_type {
> > 
> >     branch_mmc,
> >     branch_inverter,
> >     branch_factor,
> > 
> > +   branch_ddrc,
> > 
> >  };
> >  
> >  struct rockchip_clk_branch {
> > 
> > @@ -488,6 +496,25 @@ struct rockchip_clk_branch {
> > 
> >             .child          = ch,                           \
> >     
> >     }
> > 
> > +#define COMPOSITE_DDRC(_id, cname, pnames, f, mo, ms, mw, mf,      \
> > +                    ds, dw, df)                            \
> > +   {                                                       \
> > +           .id             = _id,                          \
> > +           .branch_type    = branch_ddrc,                  \
> > +           .name           = cname,                        \
> > +           .parent_names   = pnames,                       \
> > +           .num_parents    = ARRAY_SIZE(pnames),           \
> > +           .flags          = f,                            \
> > +           .muxdiv_offset  = mo,                           \
> > +           .mux_shift      = ms,                           \
> > +           .mux_width      = mw,                           \
> > +           .mux_flags      = mf,                           \
> > +           .div_shift      = ds,                           \
> > +           .div_width      = dw,                           \
> > +           .div_flags      = df,                           \
> 
> you don't need (nor use) div and mux flags here, please use one flag
> param like the inverter type does and maybe directly add a flag like
>       ROCKCHIP_DDRCLK_SIP
> for this type.
> 
> Background being, that the ddr clock mechanism is essentially the same
> on all socs and only the method to change the rate varies
> (sip on rk3399, scpi on rk3368, something sram-based on rk3288 and before)
> so in the future, this driver should hopefully be able to carry all those
> different methods.

and maybe name it COMPOSITE_DDRCLK(...)

Reply via email to