On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:53:46AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> It was really strange to see negative vblank seqs on debug
> messages. It is rare to have that big number, but when it
> happens it is confusing and misleading.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> index 77f357b..01a5079 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> @@ -1295,7 +1295,7 @@ void drm_vblank_off(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned 
> int pipe)
>               if (e->pipe != pipe)
>                       continue;
>               DRM_DEBUG("Sending premature vblank event on disable: "
> -                       "wanted %d, current %d\n",
> +                       "wanted %u, current %u\n",
>                         e->event.sequence, seq);
>               list_del(&e->base.link);
>               drm_vblank_put(dev, pipe);
> @@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ static int drm_queue_vblank_event(struct drm_device 
> *dev, unsigned int pipe,
>  
>       seq = drm_vblank_count_and_time(dev, pipe, &now);
>  
> -     DRM_DEBUG("event on vblank count %d, current %d, crtc %u\n",
> +     DRM_DEBUG("event on vblank count %u, current %u, crtc %u\n",
>                 vblwait->request.sequence, seq, pipe);
>  
>       trace_drm_vblank_event_queued(current->pid, pipe,
> @@ -1693,7 +1693,7 @@ int drm_wait_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>               return drm_queue_vblank_event(dev, pipe, vblwait, file_priv);
>       }
>  
> -     DRM_DEBUG("waiting on vblank count %d, crtc %u\n",
> +     DRM_DEBUG("waiting on vblank count %u, crtc %u\n",
>                 vblwait->request.sequence, pipe);
>       DRM_WAIT_ON(ret, vblank->queue, 3 * HZ,
>                   (((drm_vblank_count(dev, pipe) -
> @@ -1708,7 +1708,7 @@ int drm_wait_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>               vblwait->reply.tval_sec = now.tv_sec;
>               vblwait->reply.tval_usec = now.tv_usec;
>  
> -             DRM_DEBUG("returning %d to client\n",
> +             DRM_DEBUG("returning %u to client\n",
>                         vblwait->reply.sequence);
>       } else {
>               DRM_DEBUG("vblank wait interrupted by signal\n");
> @@ -1735,7 +1735,7 @@ static void drm_handle_vblank_events(struct drm_device 
> *dev, unsigned int pipe)
>               if ((seq - e->event.sequence) > (1<<23))
>                       continue;
>  
> -             DRM_DEBUG("vblank event on %d, current %d\n",
> +             DRM_DEBUG("vblank event on %u, current %u\n",
>                         e->event.sequence, seq);
>  
>               list_del(&e->base.link);
> -- 
> 2.5.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC

Reply via email to