On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> wrote: > > i.e. 59 commits in a 5000 commit tree is likely not that bad, 59 > commits in a 20 commit tree would be bad.
I think it's about size of the commits. If it's 59 clean oneliner
fixes, I don't think it's a big deal. If it's 59 patches that add new
functionality, that's a different issue. The size of the base tree is
almost entirely irrelevant in that situation. Fixes are ok, new
features are not.
Linus
