On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 10:53:06AM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> As going through the modetest patches for atomic support I've noticed
> that if we pass NULL for the drmModeAtomicReqPtr argument we'll crash.
> 
> So let's handle things appropriately if the user forgot to check the
> return value of drmModeAtomicAlloc and drmModeAtomicDuplicate or made a
> typo somewhere along the way.

I'm not sure hand-holding the user to such an extent is actually useful.
OTOH I guess one NULL check per function call isn't all that expensive
either.

> 
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Rob Clark <robclark at freedesktop.org>
> Cc: Daniel Stone <daniels at collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com>
> ---
>  xf86drmMode.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xf86drmMode.c b/xf86drmMode.c
> index 23800dd..ab6b519 100644
> --- a/xf86drmMode.c
> +++ b/xf86drmMode.c
> @@ -1189,6 +1189,9 @@ drmModeAtomicReqPtr 
> drmModeAtomicDuplicate(drmModeAtomicReqPtr old)
>  {
>       drmModeAtomicReqPtr new;
>  
> +     if (!old)
> +             return NULL;
> +
>       new = drmMalloc(sizeof *new);
>       if (!new)
>               return NULL;
> @@ -1213,6 +1216,9 @@ drmModeAtomicReqPtr 
> drmModeAtomicDuplicate(drmModeAtomicReqPtr old)
>  
>  int drmModeAtomicMerge(drmModeAtomicReqPtr base, drmModeAtomicReqPtr augment)
>  {
> +     if (!base)
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
>       if (!augment || augment->cursor == 0)
>               return 0;
>  
> @@ -1239,12 +1245,15 @@ int drmModeAtomicMerge(drmModeAtomicReqPtr base, 
> drmModeAtomicReqPtr augment)
>  
>  int drmModeAtomicGetCursor(drmModeAtomicReqPtr req)
>  {
> +     if (!req)
> +             return -EINVAL;
>       return req->cursor;
>  }
>  
>  void drmModeAtomicSetCursor(drmModeAtomicReqPtr req, int cursor)
>  {
> -     req->cursor = cursor;
> +     if (req)
> +             req->cursor = cursor;
>  }
>  
>  int drmModeAtomicAddProperty(drmModeAtomicReqPtr req,
> @@ -1252,6 +1261,9 @@ int drmModeAtomicAddProperty(drmModeAtomicReqPtr req,
>                            uint32_t property_id,
>                            uint64_t value)
>  {
> +     if (!req)
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
>       if (req->cursor >= req->size_items) {
>               drmModeAtomicReqItemPtr new;
>  
> @@ -1309,6 +1321,9 @@ int drmModeAtomicCommit(int fd, drmModeAtomicReqPtr 
> req, uint32_t flags,
>       int obj_idx = -1;
>       int ret = -1;
>  
> +     if (!req)
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
>       if (req->cursor == 0)
>               return 0;
>  
> -- 
> 2.5.0

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC

Reply via email to