On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 06:44:34PM +0300, Jyri Sarha wrote: > On 10/06/15 12:23, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> >In a first step, before going deep in discussion on the approach, it > >should be interesting to have maintainers feedback, to be sure that my > >approach could make sense from DRM and ALSA point of view. > Absolutely. In the end the maintainers need to make the final decision any > way. As I keep saying at least for me a very big part of that is going to be seeing some degree of consensus among the people working on HDMI. I really don't want to get something merged and then having people turn up shortly afterwards saying that there's some reason to redo everything and I don't have much familiarity with the video stuff so I'm largely relying on consensus and review from the DRM side (which seems to have been absent thus far). -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20151006/07dfbcf3/attachment-0001.sig>
