On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 01:43:33PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 11/25/2015 09:27 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > >> I guess you mean that the GPIO callbacks include Runtime PM handling > >> however for irq_chip Runtime PM may not be hooked up so the GPIO block > >> is in such case is not powered on / get clock enabled? > > > > Yes. There is another drawback when GPIOs are not properly requested. It > > is still possible to request them from userspace although a kernel > > driver is using them. I am playing with the idea that the GPIO core > > auto-requests GPIOs which are not already requested but still set up as > > interrupts. > > I think the GPIO core already reserves the pins that are requested as IRQs. > See gpiochip_lock_as_irq().
I could still export them via sysfs. They were also not showing up in /sys/kernel/debug/gpio. > As for PM see this discussion > http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1511.1/01645.html Nice! Thanks for this pointer. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20151126/63bb5766/attachment.sig>
