https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92709
--- Comment #7 from Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> --- (In reply to Michel Dänzer from comment #6) > (In reply to Matt Arsenault from comment #5) > > It seems bizarre that an llvm intrinsic would ever be changed to something > > involving a library call. > > I think the exp2 -> ldexpf transform is rather questionable for us anyway, > since we have a native exp2 instruction, isn't it? Maybe we just don't want > to use the LibCallSimplifier pass? The comment at the top of > SimplifyLibCalls.cpp kind of sounds like "this is not the pass you're > looking for"... We do want this. ldexp is a full rate instruction, and exp2 is a quarter rate instruction. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20151104/8eb220e4/attachment.html>