Hi Thierry, On 05/22/2015 01:02 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 06:44:08PM +0300, Mikko Perttunen wrote: >> On 05/21/2015 06:10 PM, Arto Merilainen wrote: >>> ... >>>>> + >>>>> + vic->rst = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "vic03"); >>>> >>>> I might prefer just "vic" as the clock/reset name. The name is often >>>> used as a sort of "role" for the clock/reset for the device, not >>>> necessarily the raw name of the "correct" clock/reset. >>>> >>> >>> I considered that - but I then noticed that >>> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra124.c was already using vic03 variant. I can >>> write a patch for changing that too. >> >> Well, the two can be different; the clock-name in device tree kind of means >> "string that i use to refer to a clock that powers the VIC unit". It's not >> really a big deal though, both ways are used in DT bindings. > > I'll insist on calling this vic in the clock-names property. The 03 is > as far as I can tell an encoding of the version number, so if you want > to call this vic04 in some future version we'll have to needlessly > patch the driver.
I agree, this is better without 03 postfix will fix this in the next version. - Arto
