>
> Was honestly hoping that patch #1 is not required as:
> - Getting the drm.h header in sync with the kernel will be annoying.
Indeed.
I have a version of drm.h that works with Solaris and *should* still
work with all other consumers, but as I still have a ways to get fully to
speed, am hesitant to suggest a patch (are there other issues I have yet
to discover).
> - The struct drm_map/drmMapBufs/drmRmMap is part of the legacy drm
> cruft for which, I would like to think, there are no more users.
>
> Obviously the latter can be confirmed by Randy and friends.
I'm somewhat confused by this statement, as I still see the use of
struct drm_map, as is it's usage in the Solaris ports of drm. Am I
missing something (like I said, I still have a ways to go to get to any
decent level of contribution)?
Cheers!
---- Randy
