On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Alexandr Akulich <akulichalexander at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> wrote: >> On 22.07.2015 16:33, Alexandr Akulich wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> >>> wrote: >>>> On 17.07.2015 22:33, Alexandr Akulich wrote: >>>>> As I see, this is not a kernel header, but a local (belongs to libdrm) >>>>> one. >>>>> (Otherwise, I would like you to point me on such file at, say, >>>>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/master/include/drm) >>>> >>>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/uapi/drm/amdgpu_drm.h >>>> >>>> >>>>> At files drm_sarea.h, mga_drm.h, qxl_drm.h, radeon_drm.h and via_drm.h we >>>>> have >>>>> >>>>> #include "drm.h" >>>>> >>>>> At the same time, at i915_drm.h and tegra_drm.h. we have >>>>> >>>>> #include <drm.h> >>>>> >>>>> I'm pretty sure that the first case is correct, because drm.h is >>>>> always would be local file (in the same directory), related to >>>>> amdgpu_drm.h, and that is why local include "drm.h" would be always >>>>> valid. >>>> >>>> Makes sense to me, the patch is >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com> >>> Thanks! I have no write access to this fd.o repository. Can you apply it >>> please? >> >> I assume your patch is against the amdgpu branch of >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/drm/, right? Only Alex Deucher has >> write access to that. > > Well, what I can do? > Alex, can you apply the patch, please?
Applied. thanks! Alex
