On 10/12/15 19:00, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 10 December 2015 at 14:53, Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com> wrote: > >> It would be nice to see omapdrm eventually using the panel framework, >> etc. But I think copy/paste to decouple omapdrm from omapfb/vout as >> the first step makes sense. >> > Moar panels/bridges :-P
I have a bunch more in my TI branch, which I have never upstreamed because I haven't wanted to push too much into the omap specific panel/encoder directory... > But seriously, I think that this is the better idea, despite the > duplication that'll exist in the first place. Otherwise you'll end up > pulling your hairs out trying to balance everything drm and fbdev/vout > working. > > A suggestion... do throw a big scary warning in the fbdev copy - "Here > be dragons... old, mostly maintained code, bugfixes only please". > Otherwise some poor soul might decide to port the drm patches back > into the fbdev copy, or try to de-duplicate things :-) The fbdev maintainer (me) will block any attempts to do so, but good point, it doesn't harm to add a small README to the omapfb side. Tomi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20151210/e226da56/attachment.sig>
