On 12/07/2015 02:15 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja <architt at codeaurora.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 11/30/2015 06:15 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: >>> Hi Archit, >>> >>> [auto build test ERROR on: v4.4-rc3] >>> [also build test ERROR on: next-20151127] >>> >>> url: >>> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Archit-Taneja/drm-dsi-DSI-for-devices-with-different-control-bus/20151130-200725 >>> config: x86_64-allyesdebian (attached as .config) >>> reproduce: >>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree >>> make ARCH=x86_64 >>> >>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >>> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c: In function 'of_mipi_dsi_device_add': >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c:168:6: error: implicit declaration of >>>>> function 'of_modalias_node' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >>> if (of_modalias_node(node, info.type, sizeof(info.type)) < 0) { >> >> Any suggestions on how to fix this? Is it ok to make DRM_MIPI_DSI >> depend on CONFIG_OF? > > Please don't.
Just curious, how did x86 use DSI if the only way to create DSI devices until now was via DT? Archit > > BR, > Jani. > -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
