https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76490
--- Comment #74 from Maxim Sheviakov <mrader3940 at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Maxim Sheviakov from comment #73)
> (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #72)
> > (In reply to Maxim Sheviakov from comment #71)
> > > Hmm, nice point. By the way, is the MCLK kinda divided by four? So, if
> > > Memory Clock is 5600MHz, I'll have to do 5600/4*10000 to get the correct
> > > value? It's like, 120000 value = 1.2GHz*4 = Original frequency = 4800MHz,
> > > right? If that's it, I'll fix my quirk (AGAIN, LOL) and try using 970MHz
> > > and
> > > 5600MHz written as needed, 'cause my GPU is MSI R7 370 Armor 2X, and looks
> > > like values in quirk are *kinda* low for it.
> >
> > The mclk values are the actual mclk values. GDDR5 is quad pumped so you get
> > 4x effective data rate per clock. That might be what you are thinking of.
>
> Looks like I get it now. Today I'll try to play with those values and
> experiment with MCLK values, maybe with GPU clock too; if it's good, I will
> let everyone know.
So right now I'm building a test kernel based on Linux Zen 4.3. Changed values
in my line: from "{... 0, 120000}," to "{... 97000, 140000}", so that GPU clock
is 970MHz and Memory clock is 1.4GHz aka 5.6GHz. Will let you all know if I
succeed in that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20151201/76731cb1/attachment.html>
