https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60879
--- Comment #89 from Michel D?nzer <michel at daenzer.net> ---
(In reply to comment #88)
> Is this patch supposed to apply cleanly against mesa 10.1.5?
No, looks like it's for Git master, should probably apply against the 10.3
branch at least though.
(In reply to comment #87)
> Fix v3
[...]
> + for (i = 0; i < num_se; i++) {
> + si_pm4_set_reg(pm4, GRBM_GFX_INDEX,
> + SE_INDEX(i) |
> + SH_BROADCAST_WRITES |
> + INSTANCE_BROADCAST_WRITES);
> + si_pm4_set_reg(pm4, R_028350_PA_SC_RASTER_CONFIG,
> raster_config);
> + }
Since this uses the same raster_config value for all SEs, couldn't it just use
a single write with SE_BROADCAST_WRITES enabled in GRBM_GFX_INDEX?
If not:
> + unsigned sh_per_se = MAX2(sctx->screen->b.info.max_sh_per_se,
> 1);
> + unsigned num_se = MAX2(sctx->screen->b.info.max_sh_per_se, 1);
sh_per_se and num_se have the same value. Should one of them be calculated
differently, or does a single variable suffice?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20140910/67e08cb1/attachment.html>
