On Mo, 2014-10-27 at 22:09 +0000, Zachary Reizner wrote: > ajax, > What do you mean by a pci revision id bump? Do you want it in qemu or > the kernel? Why is a revision bump needed when none of the behavior of > the cirrus device has changed?
revision bump would be needed when adding a new interface (not present in real hardware) to allow for larger pitches, so you could use 32bpp with the default (1024x768) resolution. > I heartily agree, people should stop using cirrus. And qemu > should stop > defaulting to it. Since neither has happened yet, enhancing > the > emulation holds the promise of making the future better... I'll try flip the default. That is more sane than pimping up the cirrus emulation. cheers, Gerd
