On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:48:26AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda at samsung.com> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index dd31933..476679c 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -3071,6 +3071,13 @@ F: drivers/gpu/vga/ > F: include/drm/ > F: include/uapi/drm/ > > +DRM MIPI DSI BUS > +M: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda at samsung.com> > +L: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org > +S: Supported > +F: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c > +F: include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
I really prefer when common infrastructure like this doesn't get maintainer by a vendor. And I care with my intel hat on since we also ahve a dsi driver that sooner or later needs to be converted to to this stuff. Why doesn't the usual model of merging stuff through Dave's tree, or if that doesn't work well due to patch depencies, through vendor trees with Dave's ack? Thanks, Daniel > + > RADEON DRM DRIVERS > M: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com> > M: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> > -- > 1.9.1 > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
