On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 02:51:34PM +0100, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan at collabora.co.uk>
> 
> There is no point in flipping a buffer for a disabled crtc.

That thing doesn't actually flip but just signal the frontbuffer
tracking code that either has just flipped or is going to real soon now
(tm). But yeah, still makes no sense when the entire pipe is off, so:

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan at collabora.co.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 8530401..9a913f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -8544,9 +8544,9 @@ static int intel_crtc_cursor_set_obj(struct drm_crtc 
> *crtc,
>               if (old_width != width)
>                       intel_update_watermarks(crtc);
>               intel_crtc_update_cursor(crtc, intel_crtc->cursor_bo != NULL);
> -     }
>  
> -     intel_frontbuffer_flip(dev, INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_CURSOR(pipe));
> +             intel_frontbuffer_flip(dev, INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_CURSOR(pipe));
> +     }
>  
>       return 0;
>  fail_unpin:
> -- 
> 1.9.3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Ville Syrj?l?
Intel OTC

Reply via email to