Hi Steven
I'm glad to see you to discuss about rk29xx.
On 2014?10?08? 06:26, Steven Newbury wrote:
> I've just been discussing how this relates to rk29xx on #etnaviv. I
> looked through the patch and it's good to see it's not limited to
> supporting Mali GPUs. I see no reason this wouldn't be compatible
> with etna_viv for rk29xx (or future Rockchip designs with alternative
> GPUs) as long as the rest of the infrastructure to support rk29 is in
> place iommu (ARM SMMU?) driver, for example.
Now the drm driver only test on rk3288, and future when we add
compatible for rk29xx, we
would consider to add a non-iommu path for it.
> IMHO it's vital to keep a logical separation between the video display
> hardware and the graphics processor on SoCs.
Sure, the graphics processor maybe change in different solutions,
logical separation is that we
try to keep.
Regards
-?ark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141008/7f3fe445/attachment.html>
