https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86368
--- Comment #1 from debguy <johnandsara2 at cox.net> --- (all i meant with comments are: goal is not to continually upgrade gcc, bison, etc, causing old code to be incompatible and faile: but to compile new software: which is easily possible with early tools, new ELF or arch aside. __builtin could be a macro or check to see if accel was avail, rather than using a tweak in gcc only new gcc has. gcc is not the place to add convenience functions: it's just not where they go. libc might be. even then for a bit count that's the wrong avenue to expect C libs to be a "perl, unix in a big module" of every new new bithack stacked against every kernel support of. i was pretty user processor support hacks are per arch in kernel, and lib c sparsely supported them and driver coders commonly checked in the driver code where useful for such, having both choices on hand) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141117/01d0880a/attachment.html>
