On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Christian K?nig
<deathsimple at vodafone.de> wrote:
> Am 26.03.2014 14:03, schrieb Alex Deucher:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Christian K?nig
>> <deathsimple at vodafone.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>>
>>> If the IB test fails we don't want to reset the card over
>>> and over again, just accept that it isn't working.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
>>
>> You might want to add the link to the bug.
>
>
> Good point.
>
>
>> Other than that:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
>
>
> Do you think there will be another drm-fixes-3.14 this patch might become
> part of or should we pull it in through drm-next-3.15?
>
Probably 3.15 at this point.
Alex
> Christian.
>
>
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c
>>> index 15e44a7..8391fca 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c
>>> @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ int radeon_ib_ring_tests(struct radeon_device *rdev)
>>> r = radeon_ib_test(rdev, i, ring);
>>> if (r) {
>>> ring->ready = false;
>>> + rdev->needs_reset = false;
>>>
>>> if (i == RADEON_RING_TYPE_GFX_INDEX) {
>>> /* oh, oh, that's really bad */
>>> --
>>> 1.9.1
>>>
>
