On 27.06.2014 09:53, Dieter N?tzel wrote: > Am 26.06.2014 12:39, schrieb Christian K?nig: >> Am 26.06.2014 11:29, schrieb Michel D?nzer: >>> From: Michel D?nzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com> >>> >>> Prevents radeon_crtc_handle_flip() from running before >>> radeon_flip_work_func(), resulting in a kernel panic due to the BUG_ON() >>> in drm_vblank_put(). >>> >>> Tested-by: Dieter N?tzel <Dieter at nuetzel-hh.de> >>> Signed-off-by: Michel D?nzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com> >> >> Does patch #2 alone fixes the problem as well? > > With #2 alone I get this during boot up (before plymouth):
[...] > [ 15.259867] [drm:radeon_crtc_handle_flip] *ERROR* > radeon_crtc->flip_status = 0 != RADEON_FLIP_SUBMITTED(2) That's the original patch I sent to you along with two others for testing. The patch I submitted in this series has these messages downgraded to debugging messages, as they just show the patch preventing bad stuff from happening as designed. The question is, can you reproduce the panic or the 'impossible msc' lines in the Xorg log with only patch #2? > But with Michel's #1+2 and 3 I got this in Xorg.0.log: > (See Xorg.0.log.old.xz) > > (EE) [mi] EQ overflowing. Additional events will be discarded until > existing events are processed. That may not be directly related to the page flipping issues. -- Earthling Michel D?nzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
