On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:33:18AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Return 2 so we can be sure the kernel has the necessary
> changes for acceleration to work.

I highly dislike that ? Why about just using nop2 in userspace ?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
> index 35d9318..dcec4ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
> @@ -254,7 +254,14 @@ static int radeon_info_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, 
> void *data, struct drm_file
>               }
>               break;
>       case RADEON_INFO_ACCEL_WORKING2:
> -             *value = rdev->accel_working;
> +             if (rdev->family == CHIP_HAWAII) {
> +                     if (rdev->accel_working && rdev->new_fw)
> +                             *value = 2;
> +                     else
> +                             *value = 0;
> +             } else {
> +                     *value = rdev->accel_working;
> +             }
>               break;
>       case RADEON_INFO_TILING_CONFIG:
>               if (rdev->family >= CHIP_BONAIRE)
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to