Sorry for the noise! Please disregard the patch for now, it causes more trouble
than it solves!
- Tobias
?
Gesendet:?Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2014 um 15:57 Uhr
Von:?"Tobias Jakobi" <tjakobi at math.uni-bielefeld.de>
An:?linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org
Cc:?dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org, t.figa at samsung.com, inki.dae at
samsung.com, "Tobias Jakobi" <tjakobi at math.uni-bielefeld.de>
Betreff:?[PATCH] drm/exynos: g2d: let exynos_g2d_get_ver_ioctl fail
Currently the DRM_IOCTL_EXYNOS_G2D_GET_VER ioctl always succeeds, even
if no G2D support is available. Let the ioctl fail when this is the
case, so that userspace can accurately probe for G2D support.
This also fixes the exynos tests in libdrm. There 'g2d_init' doesn't
fail when G2D is absent, leading to a segfault later.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi at math.uni-bielefeld.de>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c
index 5fa1bb6..cde8a89 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c
@@ -1042,8 +1042,19 @@ err:
int exynos_g2d_get_ver_ioctl(struct drm_device *drm_dev, void *data,
struct drm_file *file)
{
+ struct drm_exynos_file_private *file_priv = file->driver_priv;
+ struct exynos_drm_g2d_private *g2d_priv = file_priv->g2d_priv;
+ struct device *dev = g2d_priv->dev;
+ struct g2d_data *g2d;
struct drm_exynos_g2d_get_ver *ver = data;
+ if (!dev)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ g2d = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ if (!g2d)
+ return -EFAULT;
+
ver->major = G2D_HW_MAJOR_VER;
ver->minor = G2D_HW_MINOR_VER;
--
1.8.5.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
