Hi Varka,
This irq handler should be registered in attach() and unregistered in
detach().
The devm_* APIs are released(freed) in remove(), right?
Logically the panel could be attached and detached several times after
dsi is probed and not removed.
So I don't use devm_* APIs.
Thank you.
Best regards YJ
On 07/22/2014 07:57 PM, Varka Bhadram wrote:
> On 07/22/2014 04:19 PM, YoungJun Cho wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>> + ret = gpio_request_one(dsi->te_gpio, GPIOF_IN, "te_gpio");
>
> devm_* APIs..?
>
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dsi->dev, "gpio request failed with %d\n", ret);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * This TE GPIO IRQ should not be set to IRQ_NOAUTOEN, because panel
>> + * calls drm_panel_init() first then calls mipi_dsi_attach() in
>> probe().
>> + * It means that te_gpio is invalid when exynos_dsi_enable_irq() is
>> + * called by drm_panel_init() before panel is attached.
>> + */
>> + ret = request_threaded_irq(gpio_to_irq(dsi->te_gpio),
>> + exynos_dsi_te_irq_handler, NULL,
>> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "TE", dsi);
>
> why don't we use devm_request_threaded_irq()..?
>
>
