On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Alex Deucher <alexdeuc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> From: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com> >>> >>> Since fafcf94e2b5732d1e13b440291c53115d2b172e9 introduced an edid size, it >>> seems to have broken this path. >>> >>> This manifest as oops on T500 Lenovo laptops with dual graphics primarily. >>> >>> Should fix: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33812 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com> >>> cc: sta...@kernel.org >> >> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeuc...@gmail.com> >> >> Although, I think there may be a problem with the mux switching since >> we shouldn't hit the hardcoded EDID unless DDC fails. > > I've avoided having to do a MUX switch for DDC so far since I've no > idea how to enumerate what the MUX is attached to properly.
Ah ok. That would explain the bugs where VGA/DVI ddc doesn't work you switch gfx. Alex > > The good thing is the table has worked fine up until now. > > Dave. > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
