On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:20:13PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:03:06PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > So has this been benchmarked - intuitively I'd agree and expect that a > > shadowfb driver ought to give best performance. > > No, but it's noticably nicer to use under virt-manager. I'll try to come > up with some numbers.
x11perf shows it winning on every benchmark, with results ranging from 10% to >20000% higher. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
