Hi Russell, On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux < linux at arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 04:12:19PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > Am Montag, den 10.02.2014, 12:28 +0000 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux: > > > This is the latest revision of my series cleaning up imx-drm and > > > hopefully getting it ready to be moved out of drivers/staging. > > > This series is updated to v3.14-rc2. > > > > > > Since the last round of patches were posted, the component support > > > has been merged into mainline, and thus dropped from this series. > > > Greg has taken the first three patches and merged them into his > > > linux-next tree - however, I include them here for completness. > > > > > > Most of the comments from last time still apply, and I'll look at > > > incorporating some of the other patches that were posted in the > > > coming week. > > > > > > If I can have some acks for this, I'll start sending some of it to > > > > > > > > > Greg - I'd like to at least get the five or six initial imx-hdmi > > > patches to Greg and queued up for the next merge window sooner > > > rather than later, preferably getting most of this ready for that > > > window too. > > > > For the first 9 patches up to (including) "imx-drm: ipu-v3: more > > clocking fixes": > > Acked-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel at pengutronix.de> > > > > As you say, comments about the device tree bindings still apply. > > I'd prefer if the patches that currently use the crtcs property were > > reworked to use the v4l2 style device tree bindings before they hit > > mainline. > > I'm trying /not/ to do that much more work on this because there's > other things that need my attention, like a complete rewrite of the > SDHCI mess. I want to get the imx-drm stuff off my plate so I don't > have to worry about it. > > So, I'd really like _all_ these patches to go into mainline for v3.15 > with the least rework possible so I can spend the next few months > working on rewriting SDHCI. > I'd like all of them to go through, too. If you don't want to have the DT changes integrated, I'd appreciate if you could have a look at my patches on top of your series and possibly append them to your series or let me synchronize somehow: http://archive.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20140106.145159.a1d82ba9.en.html I'll prepare an updated more complete version that should work on the CarrierOne. Some feedback would be appreciated so I can improve them in time for your series' final submission. The only thing I'd like to avoid is to have a stable v3.15 release with the old IPU specific bindings widely used due to the newly added HDMI support. What I don't want is carrying hundreds of patches across multiple > kernel versions. > No complaints there. Now, mind explaining what "v4l2 style device tree bindings" means? I've > no idea since I'm relatively new to DT. > Sorry, I was under the impression that people at the 2013 kernel summit drm/dt discussion were aware of those bindings and kind of agreed on (or at least did not oppose) them: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt The first patch of the above patchset adds the i.MX6 specific connections for the output paths according to this binding: http://archive.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20140106.145200.24ed4a48.en.html regards Philipp -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20140210/9bfbbe00/attachment-0001.html>
