Hi Thierry, On 12/11/2014 10:52 AM, Liu Ying wrote: > Hi Thierry, > > On 12/10/2014 08:21 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:37:17PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote: >>> The MIPI DSI bus driver would try to add a DSI device for a host's every >>> child node which contains the reg property. Unfortunately, the existing >>> i.MX6Q/SDL MIPI DSI host device tree node's child nodes contain the reg >> >> There aren't any existing nodes for the DSI host on i.MX. This patch >> series adds support for them. > > There are existing nodes for the DSI host node. Please find them in > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi and arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dts. The DSI > host node contains two child nodes for i.MX6DL and another two for > i.MX6Q. Each child node has a reg property embedded. > >> >>> property, but the child nodes are ports pointing to dedicated CRTCs. >>> So, this patch phases out the child nodes with input-port property >>> before >>> adding DSI devices for them and updates the MIPI DSI bus OF binding >>> documentation. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Liu Ying <Ying.Liu at freescale.com> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mipi/dsi/mipi-dsi-bus.txt | 4 ++++ >>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c | 5 +++-- >>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> Sorry, but NAK. There's no need for this special-case. I'll go into more >> detail in response to patch 09/15. > > Thanks for reviewing the patches. > > Any idea how to handle the special case? The existing child nodes for > the DSI host node do have the reg properties embedded. >
I see your suggestions on this topic in the comments for patch 09/15. I will try to move the existing child nodes into a parent port node. Liu Ying > >> >> Thierry >> > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
