On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:23:17 +1000, Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com> > > This has always used a big hammer, but that hammer is probably > too big, I'm also not sure its necessary but at least this > should be safe.
So the difference appears to be that the patch only restores the fbcon of a device for the lastclose of that device. That makes sense. However, would it not be better to make this a generic drm_fb_helper_restore_mode() as it sounds like something every driver should consider? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
