On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Alexandre Demers <alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11-02-11 06:21 AM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Corbin Simpson >> <mostawesomed...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 6:49 AM, James Simmons <jsimm...@infradead.org> >>> wrote: >>>>> I was looking at the radeon support state in libkms and I found out the >>>>> following patch was proposed back in September, but never commented nor >>>>> merged. The patch was submitted by nobled. >>>>> >>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2010-September/003740.html >>>>> >>>>> I applied it on the latest drm git version without any problem and >>>>> compilation looks fine. Is there a reason preventing it from being merged? >>>>> >>>>> If it needs testing, make your suggestion, I'll gladly make my best to >>>>> test it. >>>> Good point. Is KMS dead? Anyone? >>> I was seriously hoping that Dave's dumb buffer API would go upstream >>> and that libkms would be able to use that generic path for all KMS >>> drivers, rather than needing shim code for every driver it supports. >>> >>> That said, yeah, the libkms maintainer probably should pull that code >>> in. Who is that, anyway? >>> >>> ~ C. >> That would probably be me. >> >> The "core" libkms changes are rb/acked and the radeon changes looks >> good so just go ahead and commit them anyways. Nobled do you have >> commit access to the drm repo? >> >> Cheers Jakob. > > I don't think Nobled has commit access. But to be sure, I'm adding it to > the conversation. ;) > > -- > Alexandre Demers > > > >
Haha, no, no commit access. (not subscribed on dri-devel, either, so thanks for the CC) But while I'm here, is there any advice anywhere for getting patches noticed a little... sooner? 'Cause I have a whole bunch of *other* months-old mesa-dev patches nobody's committed yet. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
