On 06/21/2012 01:10 PM, Phillip Frost wrote: > Not a problem if you have money to spend on battery-backed cache, and can > tolerate the added risk of power loss when the battery has failed, or is > reconditioning, or is being replaced, or power loss longer than battery hold > time, but for everyone else, it's a big problem.
I'd argue that it's problematic even then. If your assumptions are correct, I don't see anything here that asserts that the sync call has even reached the RAID Controller cache. It all seems quite suspicious though - a bug like that should have been noticed earlier, or so I'd believe. _______________________________________________ drbd-user mailing list drbd-user@lists.linbit.com http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
