Hello all,
   personally I like the split file layout, even on my small system, and use
   it where I can.
   It makes it easy for 'testing' also, as you can 'remove' a whole file from
   the config. So if you change a bit of software (upgrade) / hardware and
   need new bits to make it work, it can be quick and easy to remove all the
   'stuff' for that new bit if something has broken, and specify where error
   messages go for that specific part of the config (so you know that that
   new error message file is just available since the new config).
   Also you can name a bit of config for a specific purpose, eg a database,
   and you know that the details within are specific to how that database
   interacts with other stuff.
   I use this a lot as I have multiple different databases installed for
   testing stuff, and can then easily switch between if something doesn't
   work.
   But I can also see that it can have dissagvantages, and you don't want to
   duplicate configs controls across different files, as it can become a mess
   to know which one has taken precendence !
   D
   Le ven. 12 dec. 2025 `a 15:40, n4ch0 via dovecot <[1][email protected]>
   a ecrit :

     12 de diciembre de 2025, 12:06, "Noah Meyerhans" <[2][email protected]
     
mailto:[3][email protected]?to=%22Noah%20Meyerhans%22%20%3Cfrodo%[4]40morgul.net%3E
     > escribio:

     >
     > On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 07:12:28AM -0300, N4ch0 via dovecot wrote:
     >
     > >
     > > Oh, then it was my mistake to assume that Dovecot separated its
     > >  configuration into multiple files and not that it originally does
     it in a
     > >  single one.
     > >  100% my reading error. Thank you.
     > >  What do you advise/recommend?
     > >
     > Distributions split files this way because it makes it easier for the
     > distribution packages and the administrator to stay out of each
     other's
     > way. It simplifies the process when upgrading packages, making it
     > easier and more reliable for you to pick up new distro-provided
     > configuration while preserving your modifications.
     >
     > If you want to build up your own config from scratch and avoid
     whatever
     > the distro provides, you may find it easier to use a single monolithic
     > file. If you want to start from the distro configuration and only make
     > changes as needed to suit the needs of your deployment, then stick
     with
     > the split file layout.
     >
     > noah
     > (Debian dovecot maintainer)
     >

     Okay, that's clear. I've been using Debian for 15 years on both servers
     and desktops.

     I used to use Courier on my mail servers, and now I've started using
     Dovecot. I didn't have any problems until I had to go to its official
     documentation and see how to configure the quota.

     Everything's clear now, thanks for everything!
     _______________________________________________
     dovecot mailing list -- [5][email protected]
     To unsubscribe send an email to [6][email protected]

References

   Visible links
   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. mailto:[email protected]
   3. mailto:[email protected]
   4. http://40morgul.net/
   5. mailto:[email protected]
   6. mailto:[email protected]
_______________________________________________
dovecot mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to