With simple minimal config
dovecot_config_version = 2.4.2
dovecot_storage_version = 2.4.0
mail_driver = maildir
mail_home = /home/vmail/%{user}
mail_path = ~/mail
passdb static {
password = # hidden, use -P to show it
}
#####
doveadm mailbox create -u testuser foo.bar.baz
#####
~# find /home/vmail/testuser/
/home/vmail/testuser/mail/tmp
/home/vmail/testuser/mail/cur
/home/vmail/testuser/mail/new
/home/vmail/testuser/mail/.foo.bar.baz
/home/vmail/testuser/mail/.foo.bar.baz/tmp
/home/vmail/testuser/mail/.foo.bar.baz/new
/home/vmail/testuser/mail/.foo.bar.baz/dovecot.index.log
/home/vmail/testuser/mail/.foo.bar.baz/maildirfolder
/home/vmail/testuser/mail/.foo.bar.baz/cur
/home/vmail/testuser/mail/.foo.bar.baz/dovecot-uidlist
Does this suffice as evidence?
Aki
> On 10/12/2025 12:34 EET byteme--- via dovecot <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> You haven't provided a plausible solution to this claim yet. So, for me, it's
> just an unproven assertion! Okay?
>
> Furthermore, you haven't provided a single working solution for our
> situation. If anything, we've only received brief statements, no explanation
> of why or how!
>
> The fact is, it didn't work here! Therefore, "maildir++ style .foo.bar
> folders are totally still accepted by Dovecot 2.4" is an unproven and
> boastful claim. I've now found a solution.
>
> Your complete upgrade from 2.3 to 2.4, which was supposed to run better than
> major release 3.0, is a disgrace in terms of implementation and, above all,
> documentation. Given these facts, I would suggest you be a bit more modest
> and at least say thank you for the external support.
>
> These kinds of half-baked claims really make me angry!
>
> ByteMe
> _______________________________________________
> dovecot mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
dovecot mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
