> > > > The problem is a bit what everyone understands as s3. I associate > this indeed also with an http endpoint on object storage. But the ceph > plugin skips this http and talks directly to object store. I don't think > you would like to operate on this http level. If I look at this page of > ceph[1], it also looks like you do not want to get yourself involved in > deduplication. > > [1] > https://docs.ceph.com/en/reef/dev/deduplication/ > > > > > Moreover, following Filip remark about block deduplication, having any kind > of deduplication that is not optimized for the email case (where > attachments are always embed in slightly different documents) would make it > ineffective.
Dovecot has this option to store attachments separately not? So I am not sure this is then still a problem. > Is it really worse bothering deploying a whole Ceph cluster for that ? > No you should not get ceph just for this. But ceph brings you nice redundancy, distributed storage. I am totally fan of it. _______________________________________________ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
