Sad, had planed to migrate my dovecot cluster (2x director 2x IMAP from 2.2.36 (CentOS 7) to 2.4 (AlmaLinux 9, when 2.4 is released).
So, does anyone already built a STABLE(!) alternative for director? @Aki: Is dovecot IMAP 2.4 expected to still work with dovecot director 2.2 (or 2.3)? In this case I may just upgrade the IMAP Servers and leave the director/loadbalancer servers for some time. In general: Is the upgrade from 2.2 to 2.3 or 2.4. smooth or are there a lot of breaking changes and the upgrade would have to be planend thoroughly? thanks, Steven > Am 01.06.2023 um 12:32 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot@dovecot.org>: > > >> On 01/06/2023 12:16 EEST Marc <m...@f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> >>>> On 01/06/2023 11:37 EEST Marc <m...@f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Is there a specific reason why there are (still) no el9 packages? >>>> https://repo.dovecot.org/ce-2.3.17/centos/ >>>> https://repo.dovecot.org/ce-2.3-latest/rhel/ >>>> >>> >>> Because 2.3 still does not support RHEL9. It will be added for 2.4. >>> >> >> Oh shit, I did not expect there was such a huge dependency on the os for >> dovecot. I have already removed some old test el8 stuff and upgrading from >> el7 to el9. So nothing with el8. Is it really a big problem to get dovecot >> 2.3 to work on el9? I have the impression the differences between el8 and >> el9 are not so significant. For now the srpms I tried from el8 seem ok to >> compile on el9. >> > > There are some stuff that we rather fix for 2.4 than 2.3. I am aware of a > patch for TLS code in Dovecot that redhat uses. > >> This 2.4 will have this director removed not? > > Yes. > > Aki > _______________________________________________ > dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org > To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org _______________________________________________ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
