> On Jan 9, 2022, at 22:35, Aki Tuomi <aki.tu...@open-xchange.com> wrote: > > >> On 10/01/2022 05:32 Bert JW Regeer <xiste...@0x58.com> wrote: >> >> >> Hello, >> >> I have dovecot 2.3.17 running on FreeBSD 12.2 and it keeps panicking: >> >> Jan 10 03:04:07 strida dovecot[55198]: >> imap(xiste...@0x58.com)<56382><dx4KlzHVQecmAQKCQwA50VytdgLnsQSr>: Panic: >> file array.c: line 10 (array_idx_modifiable_i): assertion failed: (idx < >> array->buffer->used / array->element_size) >> Jan 10 03:04:07 strida dovecot[55198]: >> imap(xiste...@0x58.com)<56382><dx4KlzHVQecmAQKCQwA50VytdgLnsQSr>: Fatal: >> master: service(imap): child 56382 killed with signal 6 (core not dumped - >> https://dovecot.org/bugreport.html#coredumps) >> >> Ignore the core not dumped, this is happening over and over, and I got one >> process to core dump: >> >> # lldb /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap -c imap.core >> (lldb) target create "/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap" --core "imap.core" >> Core file '/usr/local/vmail/domains/0x58.com/xistence/imap.core' (x86_64) >> was loaded. >> (lldb) bt >> * thread #1, name = 'imap', stop reason = signal SIGABRT >> * frame #0: 0x0000000011588c2a libc.so.7`__sys_thr_kill + 10 >> frame #1: 0x0000000011587084 libc.so.7`__raise + 52 >> frame #2: 0x00000000114fd279 libc.so.7`abort + 73 >> frame #3: 0x00000000113736f3 >> libdovecot.so.0`___lldb_unnamed_symbol873$$libdovecot.so.0 + 147 >> frame #4: 0x0000000011371eaf >> libdovecot.so.0`___lldb_unnamed_symbol862$$libdovecot.so.0 + 47 >> frame #5: 0x0000000011372c71 >> libdovecot.so.0`___lldb_unnamed_symbol864$$libdovecot.so.0 + 33 >> frame #6: 0x00000000113720bb libdovecot.so.0`i_panic + 187 >> frame #7: 0x0000000011363d3f libdovecot.so.0`array_idx_modifiable_i + 79 >> frame #8: 0x0000000011ef7c68 >> lib20_fts_plugin.so`fts_user_autoindex_exclude + 72 >> frame #9: 0x0000000011ef550f lib20_fts_plugin.so`fts_mailbox_allocated + >> 239 >> frame #10: 0x000000001113ed5a >> libdovecot-storage.so.0`hook_mailbox_allocated + 154 >> frame #11: 0x00000000111381e1 libdovecot-storage.so.0`mailbox_alloc + 449 >> frame #12: 0x0000000001043db4 imap`cmd_select_full + 356 >> frame #13: 0x000000000104c582 imap`command_exec + 178 >> frame #14: 0x000000000104ae8a imap`___lldb_unnamed_symbol58$$imap + 58 >> frame #15: 0x000000000104af91 imap`___lldb_unnamed_symbol58$$imap + 321 >> frame #16: 0x00000000010499e7 imap`client_handle_input + 471 >> frame #17: 0x0000000001048178 imap`client_input + 120 >> frame #18: 0x000000001138ca9f libdovecot.so.0`io_loop_call_io + 111 >> frame #19: 0x000000001138f45b >> libdovecot.so.0`io_loop_handler_run_internal + 347 >> frame #20: 0x000000001138cffa libdovecot.so.0`io_loop_handler_run + 346 >> frame #21: 0x000000001138ce58 libdovecot.so.0`io_loop_run + 88 >> frame #22: 0x00000000112f11c8 libdovecot.so.0`master_service_run + 24 >> frame #23: 0x000000000105a417 imap`main + 1383 >> frame #24: 0x000000000103bed2 imap`_start + 226 >> (lldb) ^D >> >> >> I was able to generate a core dump by issue a doveadm command too: >> >> (lldb) bt >> * thread #1, name = 'doveadm', stop reason = signal SIGABRT >> * frame #0: 0x00000008017b1c2a libc.so.7`__sys_thr_kill + 10 >> frame #1: 0x00000008017b0084 libc.so.7`__raise + 52 >> frame #2: 0x0000000801726279 libc.so.7`abort + 73 >> frame #3: 0x000000080159c6f3 >> libdovecot.so.0`___lldb_unnamed_symbol873$$libdovecot.so.0 + 147 >> frame #4: 0x000000080159aeaf >> libdovecot.so.0`___lldb_unnamed_symbol862$$libdovecot.so.0 + 47 >> frame #5: 0x000000080159ae71 libdovecot.so.0`default_fatal_handler + 33 >> frame #6: 0x000000080159b0bb libdovecot.so.0`i_panic + 187 >> frame #7: 0x000000080158cd3f libdovecot.so.0`array_idx_modifiable_i + 79 >> frame #8: 0x0000000802236c68 >> lib20_fts_plugin.so`fts_user_autoindex_exclude + 72 >> frame #9: 0x000000080223450f lib20_fts_plugin.so`fts_mailbox_allocated + >> 239 >> frame #10: 0x0000000801367d5a >> libdovecot-storage.so.0`hook_mailbox_allocated + 154 >> frame #11: 0x00000008013611e1 libdovecot-storage.so.0`mailbox_alloc + 449 >> frame #12: 0x000000080222d5fc lib20_fts_plugin.so`fts_backend_rescan + 60 >> frame #13: 0x000000080227c1a3 >> lib20_doveadm_fts_plugin.so`___lldb_unnamed_symbol15$$lib20_doveadm_fts_plugin.so >> + 99 >> frame #14: 0x000000000107172f doveadm`___lldb_unnamed_symbol134$$doveadm >> + 479 >> frame #15: 0x000000000107252c >> doveadm`doveadm_cmd_ver2_to_mail_cmd_wrapper + 2492 >> frame #16: 0x0000000001083c98 doveadm`doveadm_cmd_run_ver2 + 1416 >> frame #17: 0x00000000010836d7 doveadm`doveadm_cmd_try_run_ver2 + 71 >> frame #18: 0x0000000001086da3 doveadm`main + 835 >> frame #19: 0x000000000105fa92 doveadm`_start + 226 >> (lldb) >> >> # doveadm fts rescan -u xiste...@0x58.com >> doveadm(xiste...@0x58.com): Panic: file array.c: line 10 >> (array_idx_modifiable_i): assertion failed: (idx < array->buffer->used / >> array->element_size) >> Abort (core dumped) >> >> # dovecot-sysreport >> Gathering configurations ... >> grep: The -P option is not supported >> grep: The -P option is not supported >> grep: The -P option is not supported >> Gathering system informations ... >> Creating archive ... >> All done! Please report file >> dovecot-sysreport-strida.0x58.com-1641784164.tar.gz >> Removing temp files at /tmp/tmp.z5qJkwrW … >> >> >> >> While reading about fts/fts_squat I came across the page noting it was >> deprecated. I am running a mail server for myself, and have avoided >> installing Solr this entire time, but I guess its time to upgrade. >> >> In the mean time hopefully this core dump can help figure out what is going >> on. >> >> Bert JW Regeer > > Hi! > > This is because fts_squat is not calling fts_mail_user_init. This is a bug, > just not sure if it is going to get fixed with fts_squat being deprecated, so > it would be best to migrate to something newer, like fts_flatcurve. > > Aki
Thanks for the response Aki! Is there a big difference between: https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian <https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian> And https://github.com/slusarz/dovecot-fts-flatcurve <https://github.com/slusarz/dovecot-fts-flatcurve> (do note that it is not compatible with the latest Dovecot 2.3.17 release: https://github.com/slusarz/dovecot-fts-flatcurve/issues/17 <https://github.com/slusarz/dovecot-fts-flatcurve/issues/17>) Is there a preference to use one over the other? The former is available on my platform as a package, whereas the latter is not. I’d have to package it myself. Thanks, Bert JW Regeer
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP