Aki Tuomi <aki.tu...@open-xchange.com> (Do 25 Feb 2021 12:06:43 CET): > > > > diff --git a/src/auth/userdb-passwd.c b/src/auth/userdb-passwd.c > > index 70b9969f6..4682dc873 100644 > > --- a/src/auth/userdb-passwd.c > > +++ b/src/auth/userdb-passwd.c > > @@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ static int passwd_iterate_deinit(struct > > userdb_iterate_context *_ctx) > > cur_userdb_iter_to = timeout_add(0, > > passwd_iterate_next_timeout, > > NULL); > > } > > + endpwent(); > > return ret; > > } > > > > > > -- > > Heiko > > Hi! > We'll look into it, might be that we are missing endpwent() there indeed.
I'm not sure about the semantics of setpwent()/endpwent(), mayb the nss
plugin (here sssd) should gracefully handle a missing endwent() if it
sees a new setpwent(). But I think, it can't harm to call endpwent() on
the dovecot side.
I deployed a debian package with the above patch added onto my system,
and it seems to work.
So, should I file a bug report against dovecot?
Best regards from Dresden/Germany
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE -
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
