On 22 Oct 2020, at 15:10, Sean Kamath <kam...@moltingpenguin.com> wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 12:19, @lbutlr <krem...@kreme.com> wrote:
>> On 22 Oct 2020, at 10:05, @lbutlr <krem...@kreme.com> wrote:
>>> if address :matches ["To", "Cc"] ["*@*."] {
>> if envelope :matches :detail "to" "*" {
>> set :lower "name" "${1}";
>> redirect :copy "backup+295.${name}@@*example.com*";
>> }
>>
>> ## Started executing script 'bcc'
>> 5: envelope test
>> 5: starting `:matches' match with `i;ascii-casemap' comparator:
>> 5: getting `to' part from message envelope
>> 5: extracting `detail' part from address <krem...@kreme.com>
>> 5: finishing match with result: not matched
>> 5: jump if result is false
>> 5: jumping to line 7
>> ## Finished executing script 'bcc'
> If I read that bcc trace, it says “extracting ‘detail’ part from address
> <krem...@kreme.com>”.
OK, but that exact line is used in several examples online to get the email
address.
And it doesn't explain why "if address :matches ["To", "Cc"] ["*@*."] {" also
failed to match despite also showing the email address.
> “krem...@kreme.com” does not have a :detail part
> (https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Examples talks about this).
And I am not asking for :detail, nor am I trying to the the address
extension/plus address.
> If it were “kremels+th...@kreme.com” then the net line out to say “finished
> match with result: ‘thing’” or some such.
It should not because I am not asking for the detail, I am only asking for
:matches "*"
--
"Are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
"Well, I think so, Brain, but I can't memorize a whole opera in
Yiddish."
