On 12/07/2020 22:47, @lbutlr wrote:
On 12 Jul 2020, at 10:17, Benny Pedersen <m...@junc.eu> wrote:
@lbutlr skrev den 2020-07-12 16:43:
I an trying to write a sieve action that will take mail that is
addressed to a user only it is filed in a mailbox (e.g. "Direct") if
it is to the email AND to any other email address, then file it in a
mailbox named, e.g. "Cc". And if the mail is not addressed to the user
at all, sieve does nothing with it.
Message 1: to f...@example.com => Direct
Message 2: to/cc f...@example.com & to/cc to
any...@anydomain.tlf => CC
Optional: If it contains a specific header like
"X-bypass: secret string" => no action
Message 3: NOT to/cc f...@example.com => no action
I've gotten exactly nowhere so far
Something like
if :allof (header :contains ["to"] ["foo#example.com"],
header :contains ["cc"] ["foo#example.com"])
Takes care of the first part of the message 1 and 2 criteria. But then what?
to, cc can be one single header test
https://p5r.uk/blog/2011/sieve-tutorial.html
allof will force all headers to match, and thus it will not always work if foo
is not in both
will this solve it ?
That is helpful, but I still do not see how to test for "email has anndress other
than this address". If I simply say the address does not contain the address, then
to will not match any mail that is sent to both f...@ewxample.com AND to another unknown
email.
Maybe you could use the ":count" match from the "relational" extension
to check whether more than one address is contained in a header field
when the recipient address is already present. This doesn't address the
weird situation where the recipient address is listed more than once though.
Regards,
Stephan.
