>> Yes tell that to the people that create rhel6, rhel7 and rhel8 and give >> lts support. > >as said that has nothing to do with your wrong training and RHEL has >always the same problem: you can't package the latest and greatest shit >over 10 years because it requrires newer versions of dependencies > >so what you get with your lazyness by using a LTS distribution is a >"never change a running system, just fix the worst bugs and don't touch >anything else" > >upstream developers don't hold development for 10 years > >written from a Fedora workstation with kernel 5.6.18-200.fc31.x86_64 >from last night realyed over a datacenter firewall and a mailserver >using the same kernel > >> Unless google pays you to train your software to mark their messages as >> spam, you might want to consider yourself not to smart as well ;) > >unless i make good money from customers paying for a nearly 100% >hitrate of spam combine with a zero-false-positive policy i am likely >smarter than you
I would argue it is quite difficult to identify intelligence. I am pretty sure I would not start with your reasoning. I have a favourite German saying I like to quote in matters like these "gegen Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens" >> My solution would solve the problem others create (see the other mail). >> Your solution wastes your time and will always be carrying water to the >> sea. I think if 50% of providers in the world would do this, it would >> quickly be end of story for the spam originating from the networks like >> google and amazon. > >they won't give a shit and when i get such idiotic mails as you propose >i take the phone, call the sender and suggest to fire his mailadmin >better sooner than later > >> If there is a McDonalds build next to your home, and their clients throw >> waste into your garden. You hold McDonalds liable for cleaning this up >> not? Or are you also going to cleanup their mess indefinitely. > >what a nonsense
