Re: OCSP Stapling and Certificate Transparency

[Aki Tuomi]

On 31 October 2018 at 09:41 "Michael A. Peters" < mpet...@domblogger.net> wrote:

On 05/01/2018 09:08 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:

>

>> On 01 May 2018 at 19:03 Felipe Gasper < fel...@felipegasper.com

>> <mailto: fel...@felipegasper.com>> wrote:

>>

>>

>> Hi,

>>

>> For CAs that do not include a signed certificate timestamp in their

>> newly-issued certificates, does Dovecot support either OCSP stapling

>> or the Certificate Transparency TLS extension?

>>

>> If the TLS extension is supported, how does the admin configure the

>> timestamp for each certificate?

>>

>> I’m wondering if any MUAs will follow Google’s lead and insist on CT.

>>

>> Thank you!

>>

>> -Felipe Gasper

>> Mississauga, Ontario

>

Hi!

We are planning to add ocsp stapling support. At least Thunderbird

supports must-staple attribute.

---

Aki Tuomi

Hi, is there any more news on this?

Note I don't *personally* need it, but I provide custom dovecot RPMs for

CentOS 7 and someone asked how to do it. They want to use a certificate

that has the "must staple" feature.

(I'm personally more interested in DANE support in clients, which

dovecot doesn't need to do anything for, that's client specific)

It has not veen forgotten, just has not been done yet. We are bundling it together with other changes related to certificate handling.

I cannot provide any schedule for it yet.

---
Aki Tuomi