On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 03:47:11PM +0300, Berindeie Avram-Teodor 
<berindeie....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 2:44 PM Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi> wrote:
> > On 3 Oct 2018, at 14.09, Berindeie Avram-Teodor <berindeie....@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 1:53 PM Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi> wrote:
> >>> On 3 Oct 2018, at 13.22, Berindeie Avram-Teodor <berindeie....@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:

This seems to be a lot of discussion about a rather simple patch. What
was the reason for not including it in the 2.3.3 release, given that the
patch date says it is from August? To me it seems like a really simple
patch that shouldn't cause any problems so I would have expected it to
be included into master right away, but maybe I'm wrong there and there
is some hidden issue. If that's the case, please tell me since I'd like
to understand the reasoning a bit better.

Florian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to